The 2013 Boks after their two June tests.

June 17, 2013 in Uncategorized

What can we expect from the Boks this year when we get down to the business end of the test season . The truth is that we still don’t know. I was totally convinced that our best scrumhalves would be the Cheetah duo of Sarel Pretorius and Piet van Zyl. Then Heyneke did not pick one of them. Van Zyl then got picked after an injury to Vermaak. After Van Zyl replaced Pienaar on the weekend he looked the part in the short time that he was on. Morne Steyn did well in the first test , but less so when the Scotts turned up the pressure. That said , Steyn is still our best option after the serious injury to Goosen.

Looking at the centres and the wings i think it is only a question of picking the right players in the right positions. At this stage i will not pick JJ Engelbrecht at centre. He must play another season of superrugby at outside centre and get real comfortable there.For the immediate future i would want Serfontein and De Villiers to man the midfield. I will then pick Engelbrecht and Habana as my two wings. Willie le Roux will be my fullback . Francois Hougaardt and Patrick Lambie will be my backline reserves

The forwards poses a much bigger problem. In Bismarck ,Adriaan Strauss and Chiliboy we have more than adequate hookers. The tighthead prop is a big problem in modern day SA rugby. Herbst from the Sharks and Malherbe from the Stormers looked very impressive during the season but not one of them is in Heyneke s group. After the fiasco in the scrums especially against the Italians Heyneke will have to pick Coenie Oosthuizen and Nyakane as his props and rest Jannie and the Beast on the bench. Jannie and the Beast is definitely not playing their best rugby at the moment.

I honestly thought that Heyneke has chosen the two best locks available. Etzebeth is turning into a true test lock and is playing better and better. His discipline is also admirable because Hamilton and his offside number 6 flank were begging the boks for a good hiding. The poor ref was totally out of his depth and should be sent to a SA referee academy for classes and a good optician for glasses. Jeandre Kruger has disappointed but i am not so sure that we have a better lock available . Pieter Steph du Toit is injured and also still a bit green and needs another year to toughen him up for Bok duty. De Kock Steenkamp, not in the group and Flip Van der Merwe is possible solutions.

The loose forwards poses more problems. Arno Botha would have been my first choice as eightman and Jaques Engelbrecht the 2nd choice and because Duane Vermeulen is currently injured. Spies i would only consider for the Bulls or as a wing for the Boks. Now there is also Lappies Labuschagne(not sure if he is injured), Brussouw, Kolisi and Francois Louw fresh from his honeymoon. With Botha obviously out with injury we are stuck with Spies on number 8 and Jaques Engelbrecht not in the group.

The best solution will probably be 6 Louw 7 Kolisi 8 Spies with Willem Alberts as cover on the bench. A thought for Heyneke . This was an ideal opportunity to blood as many young guns as possible , but at the same time we know how demanding the SA public is. If everything goes well you are a hero. If anything goes wrong, it is usually blamed on the coach.

Well lets wait for Samoa for a true test of our abilities and see if we are ready for the Pumas, Wallabies and the All Blacks. Our scrumming performance in the last two matches suggests that we are very far from ready. I would play at least three fetchers, namely Francois Louw, Bismarck and Coenie Oosthuizen and call up Brussouw for the 4 nations. As much as i am in awe of the blistering pace of JJ Engelbrecht  as an outside centre i would just sleep so much better with Jan Serfontein and Jean de Villiers there. Both of them natural centres. It is much easier for a centre with pace to slot in on the wing than it is for a wing to slot in as a centre.

6 responses to The 2013 Boks after their two June tests.

  1. JDv is not not so comfortable in 13 but should retire at the end of this year…Morne offers very little creative along with his poor defence and brillant kicking..going forward i think the backs should be 9(van Zyl pienaar and reincah) 10(lambie and goosen) 12(f.steyn and jan) 13(juan and ebershon) 14(Jpp) 11(habana mvovo and basson) 15(willie,taute and ludik)

  2. JJ came once off the line which played a part in causing the 1st Scottish try; he also missed a tackle or two – but then again, so did every single player of the team during the first 60 minutes of the game, and also many other including JdV came off the line which caused forward momentum for the opponents.

    My point is that the whole team played bad, everybody, including the experienced guys, ran around like headless chickens during first 60min – and this was really expected to happen at some point anyways. New team, lots of inexperienced but eager guys but a lots of talent so it’s bound to happen.

    Personally I think that at the moment we are building for WC 2015 and HM should pick players who HE believes can peak then; which comes with a price of occasional inconsistency and mistakes at this stage – which is fine as nobody remembers these games in few years time anyway, 2015 is much more important.

    Personally I believe Jan + JJ is the frontrunner center combination for 2015 by a distance with maybe JdJ, RE or Jordaan as back-ups or impact subs even JdV can be part of that mix. I also believe that le Roux is the front runner for 15 – I just hope one bad game doesn’t mean these guys will be dropped for the “more stable players” as they are the guys who have the talent and skills to bring the cup back home in 2015.

  3. I’m actually happy with engelbrecht at 13. I’m not convinced about de villiers though. He’s still a very good player and captain, but he’s getting old and he’s not the player he used to be. Also to injury proned, so def not a long term option anymore.
    And also, Serfontein is very inexperienced still! He should’ve been playing for the baby boks in my opinion. give him another year or so of baby boks and super rugby, and then play him in the senior team.
    As for the locks, I agree with you on pieter steph du toit, but I would rather have franco van der merwe as backup then. He’s been playing really well at the sharks and has a lot of experience.

  4. Nice, objective post, boet!

  5. The scrum is going to struggle against Samoa but they play more S15 style rugby. I would play Coenie loosehead, Adriaanse tighthead, Strauss hooker. Beast, Bismark and Jannie on the bench. Flo, Siya and Spies with Houghaardt 9. I would leave the rest as they are.

  6. Not often i comment on the blogs here.
    Just thought i had to here, to tell you that this is by far the best article i have read here this season.
    I agree with almost everything you have said. Except i would Have Pienaar ahead of Hougaard. I think Hougie and Van Zyl are similar whereas Pienaar offers more stability.

Add Comment Register

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>